Real estate · U.S.
220+ bugs found and a faster search for a real estate app
Functional and UX testing of listings, search and maps, with recommendations the product team adopted.
220+ bugs reported- 220+ bugs reported
- 27 UX recommendations implemented
- 40% faster search page
- Platformsweb
- Engagement4 months · 2 QA engineers
Challenge
A listings product was released without structured testing. Users dropped off on search and listing pages, and the team had no list of what exactly was broken.
What we did
We tested listings, search, maps and account flows on desktop and mobile browsers. We reviewed the UX and delivered prioritized recommendations with recordings, and checked media upload and page performance.
Result
220+ bugs were reported and the product team adopted our UX improvements. Each release now goes through a regression checklist.
Before and after
Before Test SquadAfter
Testing No structured testing Regression checklist for every release
Known problems No list of what is broken 220+ bugs reported and prioritized
UX Users drop off on search and listings 27 of 35 recommendations implemented
Search page Slow 40% faster load
Timeline
- Weeks 1–2
Exploratory pass, bug backlog
- Weeks 3–8
Functional and cross-browser testing of all flows
- Weeks 9–12
UX review and recommendations
- Weeks 13–16
Performance checks, retest, regression checklist
Tools
-
BrowserStack - Chrome DevTools
- Lighthouse
- Postman
- Jira
- Sentry
- Hotjar
- Datadog RUM
-
WebPageTest
Testing types
Functionalexploratoryusabilitycross-browserresponsivemap and geolocationmedia upload and storage (S3)integrationregressionperformance
Want results like these?
Book a short call about your product. We can start with a free QA audit or a trial.